Rockbox mail archive
Subject: how much would a non-updating LCD wps setting save my batteries?how much would a non-updating LCD wps setting save my batteries?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: George Michaelson <ggm_at_apnic.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:00:23 +1000
I'm unsure how much current gets saved by making the WPS present a static screen
and only change per-track, or when doing filestore/menu stuff.
With backlight off, is a non-updating LCD sufficiently economic to be worth it
for battery savings? (eg on a 14 hr flight Australia->USA)
If the WPS defined a 'null' screen with NOTHING: not even static text, does it
save any more?
Whats the cost of reverse-video?
cheers
-George
Received on 2003-11-04
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:00:23 +1000
I'm unsure how much current gets saved by making the WPS present a static screen
and only change per-track, or when doing filestore/menu stuff.
With backlight off, is a non-updating LCD sufficiently economic to be worth it
for battery savings? (eg on a 14 hr flight Australia->USA)
If the WPS defined a 'null' screen with NOTHING: not even static text, does it
save any more?
Whats the cost of reverse-video?
cheers
-George
Received on 2003-11-04
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy