Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Previous message: Mike Holden: "Re: fmr polarity"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 12:07 15/11/03 +0100, you wrote:
>BlueChip wrote:
>>It would e worth calibrating the period down as low as possible, else
>>"skip, skip" would become a nightmare.
>
>That's why we haven't implemented this.
>
>Linus

As it stands it is totally *impossible* to ffwd through a long track (via
rcu)- as half of my jbr is books and radio shows - this is a problem.

If ffwd were implemented then *care* would be required for skip skip.

So it is a choice between *completely-impossible* and *care-required*.

I dislike "impossible" (as well you know) and hereby present my vote in
favour of fast forward being available as a rcu feature.

BC

• Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Previous message: Mike Holden: "Re: fmr polarity"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Remote Control Unit"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]