|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Is it time for a formal release?Re: Is it time for a formal release?
From: Mike Holden <rockbox_at_mikeholden.uklinux.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:30 -0000 (GMT) Fred Maxwell said: > I still run the 2.0 build. Why don't I use the daily builds? > > 1. Because the manual has not been updated to reflect the changes 2. > Because I never know if the daily build I have just downloaded is buggy > or not. > > It is time to consider a release. Whether it is called 2.1, 2.5, or 3.0 > matters not, but it should be done. Rockbox 2.0 has been out for seven > months and is the last official release. Numerous features have been > added since that time and I'm sure that no small number of bugs have > been squashed. > > To that end, I recommend freezing the features, updating the manual and > version history, releasing a beta, fixing any bugs that come up, and > then releasing an official version. After that, development can > continue on. Any comments from the developers? Gets my vote. I said the same when we had the same conversation a couple of weeks ago! -- Mike Holden Rockbox page: http://www.mikeholden.org/~rockboxReceived on 2003-11-17 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |