Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Is it time for a formal release?
Re: Is it time for a formal release?
From: planet77 <planet77_at_gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:47:26 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Maxwell" <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:29 AM
Subject: Is it time for a formal release?
> I still run the 2.0 build. Why don't I use the daily builds?
> 1. Because the manual has not been updated to reflect the changes
> 2. Because I never know if the daily build I have just downloaded is
> or not.
> It is time to consider a release. Whether it is called 2.1, 2.5, or 3.0
> matters not, but it should be done. Rockbox 2.0 has been out for seven
> months and is the last official release. Numerous features have been
> since that time and I'm sure that no small number of bugs have been
> To that end, I recommend freezing the features, updating the manual and
> version history, releasing a beta, fixing any bugs that come up, and then
> releasing an official version. After that, development can continue on.
> Any comments from the developers?
> Fred Maxwell
I am only a user and not a developer, but I agree 100% with you. Perhaps
only an updated manual so that the new goodies aren't to difficult if you
don't read everyday all posts. This would be great. Althoug I use my
Rockboxx everyday there are still some functions of the latest builds I
don't really know. Perhaps someone who has time can make something like an
updated FAQ or something like this.
Have a nice day
Received on 2003-11-17