Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: 2.1 Manual preliminary draft - comments please
RE: 2.1 Manual preliminary draft - comments please
From: Fred Maxwell <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:53:39 -0500
Mark Bright wrote:
> May be better as :
> Most of the developing effort went into this tooling. So
> advanced users wishing to try this modification you don't
> need to worry, more casual users may feel uncomfortable using
> the first tool to reflash the firmware.
> To comfort you a bit again: The flash tools have been stable
> for quite a while. They have been used and abused during that
> time, with some users even reflashing with a track playing.
> Having said that, however, we don't generally recommend that. ;-)
Might I suggest another wording?
"Extensive development effort went into the development of the UART boot
mod. Mechanically adept users with good soldering skills can easily perform
these mods. Others may feel uncomfortable using the first tool
(firmware_flash.rock) for reflashing the firmware.
If you are starting with a known-good image, you are unlikely to experience
problems. The flash tools have been stable for quite a while. Several users
have used them extensively, even flashing while playing! Although it worked,
it's not the recommended method. ;-)"
> Should Read : In energy save mode the peak
> meter is updated just often enough to look fluent.
I believe the word you are looking for is "fluid".
Received on 2003-11-29