From: Dennis Lui <dennis_at_thesilvercat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:28:44 -0800

" I vote for reimplementing the OFF reboot code, with the exception that

we must handle it better for the flashed versions."

You get my vote too!

-Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se] On
Behalf Of Linus Nielsen Feltzing
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:36 AM
To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
Subject: Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> In my eyes we can either get people complaining by doing like we do
now or we
> can revert the off functionality and go back to get the people
complaining
> like they did before...

I have given this some thought, and I think the previous behaviour was
better. It responded to the OFF button, and the sleep timer could enter
the "charging" state (even though it didn't back then, but it could
now).

I vote for reimplementing the OFF reboot code, with the exception that
we must handle it better for the flashed versions.

Linus
Received on 2003-12-02