Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1
RE: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1
From: Dennis Lui <dennis_at_thesilvercat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:28:44 -0800
" I vote for reimplementing the OFF reboot code, with the exception that
we must handle it better for the flashed versions."
You get my vote too!
From: owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se] On
Behalf Of Linus Nielsen Feltzing
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> In my eyes we can either get people complaining by doing like we do
now or we
> can revert the off functionality and go back to get the people
> like they did before...
I have given this some thought, and I think the previous behaviour was
better. It responded to the OFF button, and the sleep timer could enter
the "charging" state (even though it didn't back then, but it could
I vote for reimplementing the OFF reboot code, with the exception that
we must handle it better for the flashed versions.
Received on 2003-12-02