Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Mark Bright: "RE: FM Reflashing was RE: all flashed recorders"
• Previous message: Chuck Urwiler: "RE: all flashed FMs and V2s, please reflash with my latest"
• Maybe in reply to: Nathan Gray: "Re: FM Reflashing"
• Next in thread: Nathan Gray: "Re: FM Reflashing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Jorg wrote:

>This is actually my fault. For the very first flash images I have given
>out,
>I euphorically changed this number to 2.00, thinking this flashing stuff is
>worth a new major version. Later I changed my mind and kept the original
>version, who knows what it may be good for.
>So I use it for a platform check now. I had to code the exception that I
>accept 2.00 an a recorder now, because of above. But I didn't expect to
>find
>that on FMs, so the check bails out.
>
>You can flash with "firmware_flash.rock" from a daily build before 11/30,
>which didn't have the check. Then your 2.00 is gone and we're consistent
>again.
>
>Jörg

Works like a charm. Super. *happy dance*
Nathan

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of slow downloads and busy signals? Get a high-speed Internet
connection! Comparison-shop your local high-speed providers here.
https://broadband.msn.com

• Next message: Mark Bright: "RE: FM Reflashing was RE: all flashed recorders"
• Previous message: Chuck Urwiler: "RE: all flashed FMs and V2s, please reflash with my latest"
• Maybe in reply to: Nathan Gray: "Re: FM Reflashing"
• Next in thread: Nathan Gray: "Re: FM Reflashing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]