Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Björn Stenberg: "Re: Rockbox 2.1 released"
• Previous message: Mat Holton: "Re: Sleep-n-Wake"
• In reply to: Johan Vromans: "Re: will Archos pay?"
• Next in thread: eD\\/ARd0 F/\\KEn^M3: "Re: will Archos pay?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

mhhhhh,
on the one hand, there are superior filesystems - fat isn`t really the best. but on the other hand it is the most popular and it`s
doing "it`s job" here. how should i access the archos from windows or mac, if we would have minixfs or whatelse? btw: this has been
discussed on the list several (and enough) times - browse the
archives and you get further answers (pro/conra).

regards
roland

----- Original Message -----
From: "Johan Vromans" <jvromans_at_squirrel.nl>
To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: will Archos pay?

> Matias Orchard <matias_orchard_at_yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp ?
>
> Hmm. As far as i can see, there's no reason for Rockbox to stick to
> FAT. It could become a totally MS-free piece of equipment. MINIX,
> maybe?
>
> -- Johan
>

• Next message: Björn Stenberg: "Re: Rockbox 2.1 released"
• Previous message: Mat Holton: "Re: Sleep-n-Wake"
• In reply to: Johan Vromans: "Re: will Archos pay?"
• Next in thread: eD\\/ARd0 F/\\KEn^M3: "Re: will Archos pay?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]