From: <mr.escape_at_gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 17:50:27 +0100

I think that this is a misunderstanding between you and Fred. My
understanding is that he was commenting
'and so i think it was wrong to call them "thieves"'
from 'roland <for_spam_at_gmx.de>'

mr.escape


At 16:54 09.12.2003, you wrote:
>So What? Well, it just seems against the whole sharing and being nice to one
>another idea to me.
>Plus they were taking credit for something they didn't do, the fact they
>removed the headers from the files proves that. Yeah, in the grand
>scheme, of course it doesn't matter. I didn't write any of the code, so why do
>I care? Because, I repect the people who did write it, that's why - and
>they deserve it!
>
>I think it's all very interesting...
>
>mat
>
>-----Original Message-----From: Fred Maxwell <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org>To:
>rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>Sent: 09/12/2003 15:15Subject:
>RE: Oooh look ;-)> and so i think it was wrong to call them "thieves"
>
> > :)
>
>
>They took the code. They removed the credits and copyright from same. They
>
>republished it. They were polite about it when called on it. So what?
>
>
>Regards,
>
> Fred Maxwell
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>"Life's just a mood ring we're not allowed to see."
>
> They Might Be Giants.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Surface Inspection Ltd
>www.surface-inspection.com
Received on 2003-12-09