Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: FM Doom problems was Re: ANNOUNCE: Doom runs on AJB
Re: FM Doom problems was Re: ANNOUNCE: Doom runs on AJB
From: roland <for_spam_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 05:08:10 +0100
you probably made the same mistake i also made in the beginning. just put the video.rock plugin to the rocks-dir. don`t run that
plugin explicitly, just PLAY the rvf-files after roloing the doom firmware.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Gray" <sanguination_at_hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 2:40 AM
Subject: FM Doom problems was Re: ANNOUNCE: Doom runs on AJB
> Not sure what the problem is but after roloing to your Doom fm firmware and
> attempting to run the enclosed video plugin to check out the doom playing, I
> get the "plugin returned error" error again.
> Just thought it should be known if not already, that it's broken for some
> Prior to the rolo I was running flashed cvs of 03-12-13
> >From: "[IDC]Dragon" <idc-dragon_at_gmx.de>
> >Reply-To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
> >To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
> >Subject: Re: FM Reflashing
> >Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:45:37 +0100 (MET)
> > > Jorg wrote:
> > > >This may be a case of my platform checks being too strict. It checks
> > >
> > > >by
> > > >the version number. What does Debug->HW Info give you for the ROM
> > > version?
> > > >I
> > > >was prepared to see 1.23 there for FMs, maybe you have a different one?
> > >
> > > I see some interesting information in the Debug->HW Info screen.
> > > Here's a text snapshot for completeness: (note I have been flashing for
> > > awhile now)
> > >
> > > [Hardware Info]
> > > ROM: 2.00 <-- This is where 1.23 was expected, right?
> >Correct. You have that 2.00 in there for an FM? I thought I've issued that
> >only for recorders.
> >This is actually my fault. For the very first flash images I have given
> >I euphorically changed this number to 2.00, thinking this flashing stuff is
> >worth a new major version. Later I changed my mind and kept the original
> >version, who knows what it may be good for.
> >So I use it for a platform check now. I had to code the exception that I
> >accept 2.00 an a recorder now, because of above. But I didn't expect to
> >that on FMs, so the check bails out.
> >You can flash with "firmware_flash.rock" from a daily build before 11/30,
> >which didn't have the check. Then your 2.00 is gone and we're consistent
> >+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
> >Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
> Take advantage of our best MSN Dial-up offer of the year — six months
> _at_$9.95/month. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
Received on 2003-12-14