Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: Differences between V2 and original and FW
RE: Differences between V2 and original and FW
From: Dan McLaughlin <howl_at_sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:04:03 -0800
Yes the V2 charged on USB. Overall I'm not convinced the older version
is the better. The V2 has crummy buttons (I hate those), but is slimmer
and appears to have a quieter hard drive. And it charges on USB. But it
does have a non standard USB cable, and I like to have multiple cables
for the different computers I use. And it doesn't have the SPDIF. I
don't care too much one way or another about the batteries.
Over all, I guess I'll stick with the older version, if just for the
From: owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se] On
Behalf Of Rasmus Lerdorf
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: Differences between V2 and original and FW
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, howl wrote:
> On the advice of this list I returned my V2 and got the older
> to find that there are some issues with the original (non V2) one.
> can't be flashed (OK, there are warnings about this), but worse it
> charge while connected to USB. Any help?
Did your V2 charge on USB? Mine doesn't give me any indication that
is the case. I have both an original 10G Studio player and a flashed
V2 and while I do prefer the older case design and the standard
rechargable batteries along with the jack on top instead of the side
whatever that leaves is fine on the V2.
Received on 2003-12-16