|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: FW: RipDrive MP3 playerRE: FW: RipDrive MP3 player
From: TP Diffenbach <rockbox_at_diffenbach.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:44:57 -0500 Other than the hard drive type (2.5 vs 1.8) are the HD-500 and the HD-800 the same? Yes, but Roland, can we convince you to tie it to your dog's collar, to simulate a year's rough usage in a few days? ;) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se]On Behalf Of roland Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:22 PM To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se Subject: Re: FW: RipDrive MP3 player > question is, who bells the cat by buying one and knocking it around a bit? i think i will order one (hd-800) as soon as possible. i contacted them to send me information about pricing and availability in europe. i can forward that info to the list, if i receive a response and if there is interest here. regards roland ----- Original Message ----- From: "TP Diffenbach" <rockbox_at_diffenbach.org> To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 5:56 PM Subject: RE: FW: RipDrive MP3 player > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se]On > Behalf Of Björn Stenberg > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:20 AM > To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se > Subject: Re: FW: RipDrive MP3 player > > > TP Diffenbach wrote: > > Agreed, but being less mechanically inclined than you, I'd want to see > their > > source for low-level hardware interaction routines. > > Agreed. My point was just that asking companies for source code often scares > them. Asking for hardware information appears to be less threatening. > > -- > Björn > > > Point taken. > > But when companies ask me for $300, it often scares me that their hardware > may be unusable because of crap software. If it hadn't been for Rockbox, I'd > likely have returned my Archos. > > Which brings up another point: maybe I should have returned it anyway, given > that hardware problems have rendered it an inoperable $550 paper-weight. The > RipDrive/X-clef looks nice (and will look even nicer with a 60GB drive), but > I don't want another Archos-level quality control nightmare. Of course, the > question is, who bells the cat by buying one and knocking it around a bit? > Received on 2003-12-19 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |