From: jb <res0at31_at_verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:00:22 -0800

great news, thanks Brian!

i can see the benefits of both absolute and relative.

the obvious solution for someone not having to do the coding -- have both, with an
option to choose. :-)

if not feasible, i think i'd go with absolute, since one song can be in different
playlists, and may need a different relative boost depending on the playlist.

Brian King wrote:

> jb wrote:
> > it's great to see the individual per song/EQ idea being discussed. i'm not a
> > developer, so just to make a comment from the "user's" point of view:
> >
> > could there be a part of this feature where while a song is playing, you activate
> > a "create .cfg" for the song that only saves audio qualities? the .cfg would
> > already be properly named and in the proper folder for it to be automatically
> > invoked the next time the song was played.
> >
>
> That would probably be fairly straightforward for me to add to my
> existing patch. Any preferences as to whether the volume saved is an
> absolute volume or a relative volume? I would lean towards the relative
> volume, myself.
>
> -Brian
Received on 2003-12-23