Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Remake User Interface
Re: Remake User Interface
From: H C <hccebay_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Hear, Hear. I can't imagine ever changing the scroll
bar once it is set, but a quick jump to recording
would be great. This is why I am excited about the
thread discussing user-configurable quick-menus for
F2. I hope it applies to F3 as well.
--- Bram Janssens <s.a.janssens_at_student.utwente.nl>
> Remake User InterfaceI completely agree, especially
> on your comments about exiting the menu's. The
> current keybindings are not very efficient in my
> opinion and also not always as intuitive as you
> would expect. For example: the F3 function (as it is
> now), how many times are those functions (scrollbar,
> statusbar and display) used? I think less than a
> function like soundsettings or recording.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Henri
> To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 2:15 PM
> Subject: Remake User Interface
> I was looking at the interface :
> - are they plan to integrate this graphical sound
> menu we saw some time ago in patch ?
> - this patch included a remade key binding that
> was way more efficient than the current one
> (basically f1 sound menu, f2 menu, f3 wps, on
> browser, off stop). This was really interesting
> idea, we could keep quick screen on f1,f2,f3. they
> would appear after a longer press on the buttons.
> - exiting the menu is really boring as we have to
> press several time on f1 or left to exit. Why can't
> we exit the menu while pressing ONCE on ON ?
> The basic idea is that we have enought keys to
> make thing simple, so why should we keep them so
> complex ;)
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
Received on 2004-01-12