|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: roadmap to blind Rockboxing (need an audio amateur/speaker)RE: roadmap to blind Rockboxing (need an audio amateur/speaker)
From: BlueChip <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:45:59 +0000 Do I hear an echo? (echo echo echo) LOL >Maybe we could have mp3s of all phonetic "syllables" for a language and then >read words on the fly using an algorithm like soundex or metaphone. These >algorithms decompose text into its phonetic pronunciation. > >Information and source code for Soundex and Metaphone can be found here: >http://www.creativyst.com/Doc/Articles/SoundEx1/SoundEx1.htm >http://aspell.sourceforge.net/metaphone/ > >This way new words, directories, songs, etc. could be supported without >additional offline text-to-speech processing. This could be the fallback >method if a dirname.mp3 file doesn't exist for the directory or a new menu >option appears that hasn't been recorded yet. It probably wouldn't sound >very good, but it might make be sufficient. > >-Lee > >-----Original Message----- >From: rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se] On >Behalf Of [IDC]Dragon >Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:23 AM >To: Rockbox development >Subject: Re: roadmap to blind Rockboxing (need an audio amateur/speaker) > > > > Can I ask what your resistance is to the phonetic idea? (That is a > > serious question) > >Because this is pie-in-the-sky, versus for mp3 clips we have all the >infrastructure. mp3 clips from the buffer will take only minimum extra >resources, some slight changes to menu and screen code. A TTS engine is a >whole lot different. > > > My push toward it is that within a couple of versions it could be > > multi-lingual; it would at least _attempt_ to read directory and MP3 > > names, > > and the blind users (I guess) would happily rename all their files with > > appropriate phonetic names. > >For this we can use talkbox, and you can generate the directory name clips >offline on a PC, using a text-to-speach script, if you like. > > > From your post it seems the biggest hurdle would be playing samples < > > 1s > >Hu? No, you can have clips down to 1 frame, which is in the milliseconds. >And latency is also no issue, either we have the clips in the mp3 buffer >(while not playing), or we don't. > >Jörg > >-- >GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...) >jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++ > >_______________________________________________ >http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox > >_______________________________________________ >http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox Received on 2004-02-26 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |