Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: 2.2 documentationRe: 2.2 documentation
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Björn Stenberg <bjorn_at_haxx.se>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:19:46 +0100
[IDC]Dragon wrote:
> Booh, what a pity. But I understand if you consider it too last-minute.
Yes. This change could break the ata code for units with the drive configured as slave. That risk is not worth 2 second startup time. Not in a stable release.
> Is the reverse assumption true, that we can from now on commit post-2.2
> code?
Yes. 2.2 is frozen, packed and tagged.
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:19:46 +0100
[IDC]Dragon wrote:
> Booh, what a pity. But I understand if you consider it too last-minute.
Yes. This change could break the ata code for units with the drive configured as slave. That risk is not worth 2 second startup time. Not in a stable release.
> Is the reverse assumption true, that we can from now on commit post-2.2
> code?
Yes. 2.2 is frozen, packed and tagged.
-- Björn _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on 2004-03-11
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy