Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Re: CeBit 2004
Re: Re: CeBit 2004
From: Tat Tang <tat_tang_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:43:40 -0800 (PST)
> Disagree. The font.c has been modified in such a
> way that if the font is less than MAX_FONT_SIZE it >
is loaded in completely and there are no further
> disk reads to fetch characters. If the font is
> larger than MAX_FONT_SIZE the same memory area is
> reused for the cache.
Let me take that back. I agree that implementing
Unicode would need a font cache and it would be
undesirable for most users.
(I was actually thinking of 16bit chars, but we don't
need those either).
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
Received on 2004-03-19