Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: dB volume
RE: dB volume
From: Fred Maxwell <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:22:37 -0500
0 to 127 seems like a great idea to me and I don't think that non-geeks
would be put off by it either. I agree about it being better not to lose
> What's wrong with 0-127?
> We're all geeks anyway...
> No rounding error
> All values accessible
> No "percent of what" head-scratching
> Educates the not-yet-geeks
> Or, make 112=12dB, 100=0dB, 0=14dB, -14=0dB
> Beat that, Tap-heads :^)
> However, the 0..127 representing -114..+12dB puzzles me. Guess I must have
> missed a lesson in 1st grade...
> Anyway, the more options, the more satisfied geeks. Me included.
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 at 20:20, BlueChip wrote:
> > In the 3587, the volume range in 0...127, representing -114...+12dB in
> > steps
Received on 2004-03-21