From: Fred Maxwell <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:22:37 -0500

0 to 127 seems like a great idea to me and I don't think that non-geeks
would be put off by it either. I agree about it being better not to lose
steps.

Regards,
  Fred Maxwell

Gajdos_at_metatem.net wrote:

> What's wrong with 0-127?
> We're all geeks anyway...
>
> Advantages:
> No rounding error
> All values accessible
> No "percent of what" head-scratching
> Educates the not-yet-geeks
>
> Or, make 112=12dB, 100=0dB, 0=14dB, -14=0dB
> Beat that, Tap-heads :^)
>
> However, the 0..127 representing -114..+12dB puzzles me. Guess I must have
> missed a lesson in 1st grade...
>
> Anyway, the more options, the more satisfied geeks. Me included.
>
> /JG
>
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 at 20:20, BlueChip wrote:
>
> > In the 3587, the volume range in 0...127, representing -114...+12dB in
> 1dB
> > steps
> _______________________________________________
> http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox


_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on 2004-03-21