From: Bio Hazard <BioHazard_at_bak.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:19:29 -0800

the SP will fit either way as the band is shiftable (i myself like it at
45degrees back)

i dug up my old SP set last night and soldered it back together and i must
say... i forgot what sound really SOUNDED like...

with my cheap coby set, i need to crank all the eq settings up to make it
sound good (B=9 T=12 L=9 BB=50) and the max volume before clipping was 85%
with the SP i only need B=0 T=12 L=9 BB=0 and i can drive the bass up to 12
and loudness up to 17 and play some thumping with no clipping even at V=92%,
but the treble is a little lacking...

<myoppinion>
basicly if you want LOTS of bass but dont care too much about the treble, go
for the SP
</myoppinion>


does the PP have the shiftable band like the SP? and (to anyone that might
know...) what makes the PP cost $20 more than the SP? they look the same to
me... more hi-frequency capabillity perhaps? (im trying to decide wether to
go with a new SP or PP)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rocker" <rocker_at_shaw.ca>
To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: a headphone question


> Do the Koss fit behind the ear? I find those stay on my long hair the
> best...Cheers!

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on 2004-03-31