From: Aman Singer <aman_at_asinger.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:44:35 -0400

Hi.
        I agree entirely. I'm apathetic about what extension is used, but
would like to stick to whatever is chosen.
        Aman

-----Original Message-----
From: rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se] On
Behalf Of Luca
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:34 AM
To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
Subject: Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk

ok, I vote for any extension you choose, no problem..
But once choosen one, please let's dont change it again soon..

"BlueChip" <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:6.0.1.1.2.20040413122605.0459de00_at_pop.webtribe.net...
Well, if there's a vote going on - I'm all for short names, so

[X] *.tbx

>.talk is good (in fact anything except .mp3 will suit me :)
>
>g
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Björn Stenberg" <bjorn_at_haxx.se>
>To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:59 AM
>Subject: Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk
>
>
> > Mat Holton wrote:
> > > It doesn't seem like much .tbx to .talk, but it is more meaningfull.
But
>why
> > > stop at talk? why not .talkbox?
> >
> > Because 'box' doesn't actually add any information for those who haven't
>been following this mailing list and the history of Rockbox speech patches.
> >
> > --
> > Björn
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox




_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on 2004-04-13