Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"
Re: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"
From: Glenn Ervin at Home <GlennErvin_at_cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:53:49 -0500
I guess I am okay with it no matter what it is, but if we are changing it,
why not take off that dot in front, as that causes many problems in
----- Original Message -----
From: "Touillaud Nicolas" <Nicolas.Touillaud_at_fr.thalesgroup.com>
To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:20 AM
Subject: RE: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"
I think it's no big deal to change again, but I don't see the obvious
advantage of using a non-cryptic, more than 3 letters extension...
After all, if you understand mp3 = "mpeg 2 layer 3 audio file", or m3u =
"playlist", then tbx = "mp3 used by talkbox" is not harder.
As for a unique extension... Well, in a perfect world maybe, but it's too
late: .nfo stands both for an "info" text file while WinXP recognize it as a
"MSInfo Document" binary...
But I see this from an "IT aware" point of view, if it makes it easier to
understand for some people, maybe it's worth the effort.
Quite an useless post :)
De : [IDC]Dragon [mailto:idc-dragon_at_gmx.de]
Envoyé : mardi 13 avril 2004 10:53
À : Rockbox development
Objet : Re: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"
> I really hate cryptic three-letter acronyms. Why not just call the
> files .talk instead? Much more legible, intuitive and unique.
Hmm, you could have said so a few days earlier.
Do we want to change it again, then?
Received on 2004-04-14