From: Touillaud Nicolas <Nicolas.Touillaud_at_fr.thalesgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:10:15 +0200

Placing all the (./_)dirname.tbx in 1 directory mean more complexity to
organise and generate the files : it requires some kind of index file, or
will be dependant on the folder name -> inconsistency problemes, unused
files...
I'm in favor of simplicity.
In fact I can't think of any advantage of the unique directory... Feel free
to explain !

Nicolas

Ps: I already have folder.jpg (if your using winXP in Thumbernail mode, it
looks great) or even .txt files in my directories, why not a .tbx ?


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Mat Holton [mailto:mathew.holton_at_surface-inspection.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 14 avril 2004 15:42
À : rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
Objet : Re: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"

I agree with placing the files within the .Rockbox directory.
The daft thing is that if they are they are placed there, then they may as
well have the
mp3 extension!
 AArrgghh! is there no end to this?




-----Original Message-----From: George Styles <george_at_ripnet.co.uk>To:
Rockbox development <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>Sent: 14/04/2004 14:28Subject: Re:
new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"I still think that
the talkbox files should be elsewhere (say

\.rockbox\dirtalks), out of the way.


Seeing as we have to run a script on a PC to generate the files anyway, I

see no value in them being in the actual directories themselves - the script

can remove old ones, and create missing ones in one hit.


ps. Thanks for making them not .mp3 files - that was my main whine about

this talkbox stuff. Im very pleased to be able to navigate around my rockbox

when on my bike without talking it out of my pocket...


g



----- Original Message -----

From: "Jack" <jack_at_sylviawebster.f2s.com>

To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>

Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:18 PM

Subject: Re: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"



> Sorry, that was an oversight by me. You're both, of course, absolutely

right. An underscore would be useful for this.

>

> So _dirname.talk is probably best for Windows, UNIX and Rockbox alike.

>

> =======================================

>

> On 14.04.2004 at 03:13 PM [IDC]Dragon wrote:

>

> >> There isn't really any reason to have the period at all, and I don't

> >think

> >> an underscore would be of much use either!

> >

> >I liked it for moving the file away from my "payload" in alphabetical

> >sorting.

> >

> >Jörg

> >

> >--

> >NEU : GMX Internet.FreeDSL

> >Ab sofort DSL-Tarif ohne Grundgebühr: http://www.gmx.net/info

> >

> >_______________________________________________

> >http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

>

>

>

>

>

> Jack (My Website)

>

> _______________________________________________

> http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox


_______________________________________________

http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------

"Life's just a mood ring we're not allowed to see."

 They Might Be Giants.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------

Surface Inspection Ltd
www.surface-inspection.com
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on 2004-04-14