|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"Re: new extension for talkbox directory clip: ".dirname.tbx"
From: Andreas Stemmer <groovingandi_at_gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:35:59 +0200 Brian Wolven wrote: > Placing them anywhere *but* the directory where they are to be spoken is > just asking for trouble, increased code complexity, and myriad > possibilities for synchronization errors. Change the '.' to an '_', and > change 'dirname' and the extension to anything else, as long as it's > fixed. But don't decouple the clips from the folders. That's begging for > trouble, IMO. I think it would also be pretty easy to look for either > '.dirname' or '_dirname' without doing a fullblown directory search. > This would allow UNIX users to keep the files hidden, if they so choose, > and allow windows users who prefer the explorer interface to manage > their files more easily. Just to add my opinion (in case anybody cares...): I prefer having the clips within the mp3 directories to prevent any synchronization problems. I don't care about the name and the extension of the clips, as long as it's more or less self explaining and not too cryptic. I don't see any problems with dotfiles, even for windows users. Normally you create them once with a script and don't care about them afterwards. Copying and moving is no problem with the explorer once they are created. However, if there's a majority voting for an underscore-name, it's ok for me, too. Andreas _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox Received on 2004-04-14 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |