From: roland <for_spam_at_gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 00:52:00 +0200

fred - that was just a personal opinion!
:)

perhaps something like a "poll" could give a clue, how many users
think, if rockbox has too many options and if there should be done
work to make things easier for "less experienced and not so
rockbox-geeky people" ?

just my 10 cents....


ps:
> overcomplicated firmware? What's wrong with striking a balance between
> usability and features?
nothing! :)
but - how many users already complained about rockbox being overcomplicated
firmware ? there is support for all types of languages and there is an
excellent manual,too. and if someone has a problem/question and doesn`t
understand something - he can ask on this list - there is an excellent
community, too.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Maxwell" <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org>
To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: option clutter (was Re: 0505Build voice UI crash)


> roland wrote:
>
> > doesn`t matter. i like options!
>
> It doesn't matter if you like options. You aren't the only user of
> Rockbox and other people want a balance between options and the
> complications that they add to the UI.
>
> > for those people who dislike rockbox because of too many options - i think
> > they should go and stick to their original archos firmware.
>
> Why should someone have to choose between substandard firmware and
> overcomplicated firmware? What's wrong with striking a balance between
> usability and features?
>
> Regards,
> Fred Maxwell
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
>
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on 2004-05-07