|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: option clutter (was Re: 0505Build voice UI crash)Re: option clutter (was Re: 0505Build voice UI crash)
From: roland <for_spam_at_gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 00:52:00 +0200 fred - that was just a personal opinion! :) perhaps something like a "poll" could give a clue, how many users think, if rockbox has too many options and if there should be done work to make things easier for "less experienced and not so rockbox-geeky people" ? just my 10 cents.... ps: > overcomplicated firmware? What's wrong with striking a balance between > usability and features? nothing! :) but - how many users already complained about rockbox being overcomplicated firmware ? there is support for all types of languages and there is an excellent manual,too. and if someone has a problem/question and doesn`t understand something - he can ask on this list - there is an excellent community, too. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Maxwell" <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org> To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 12:15 AM Subject: Re: option clutter (was Re: 0505Build voice UI crash) > roland wrote: > > > doesn`t matter. i like options! > > It doesn't matter if you like options. You aren't the only user of > Rockbox and other people want a balance between options and the > complications that they add to the UI. > > > for those people who dislike rockbox because of too many options - i think > > they should go and stick to their original archos firmware. > > Why should someone have to choose between substandard firmware and > overcomplicated firmware? What's wrong with striking a balance between > usability and features? > > Regards, > Fred Maxwell > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox > _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox Received on 2004-05-07 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |