Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Naming convention for .Rocks
Re: Naming convention for .Rocks
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 07:15:57 +0200
Brent Geery wrote:
> Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing?
> Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when
> you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing
> all the Rocks.
> Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "."
> to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make
> them "hidden" when browsing ect.
We are looking into this patch:
which will solve this problem.
Received on 2004-05-13