dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Naming convention for .Rocks

Re: Naming convention for .Rocks

From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 07:15:57 +0200

Brent Geery wrote:

> Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing?
> Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when
> you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing
> all the Rocks.
> Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "."
> to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make
> them "hidden" when browsing ect.

We are looking into this patch:

which will solve this problem.


Received on 2004-05-13

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy