Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Naming convention for .Rocks
Re: Naming convention for .Rocks
From: Brent Geery <fasttimes_at_fasttimesatridgemonthigh.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 03:36:02 -0700
On Thu, 13 May 2004 07:15:57 +0200, Linus Nielsen Feltzing
> Brent Geery wrote:
> > Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing?
> > Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when
> > you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing
> > all the Rocks.
> > Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "."
> > to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make
> > them "hidden" when browsing ect.
> We are looking into this patch:
> which will solve this problem.
Works for me! :)
-- BRENT - The Usenet typo king. :) Fast Times At Ridgemont High Info http://www.FastTimesAtRidgemontHigh.org Voted #87 - American Film Institute's Top 100 Funniest American Films _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on 2004-05-13