|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Naming convention for .RocksRe: Naming convention for .Rocks
From: Brent Geery <fasttimes_at_fasttimesatridgemonthigh.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 03:36:02 -0700 On Thu, 13 May 2004 07:15:57 +0200, Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se> wrote: > Brent Geery wrote: > > > Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing? > > Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when > > you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing > > all the Rocks. > > > > Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "." > > to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make > > them "hidden" when browsing ect. > > We are looking into this patch: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=439120&group_id=44306&aid=879411 > > which will solve this problem. Works for me! :) -- BRENT - The Usenet typo king. :) Fast Times At Ridgemont High Info http://www.FastTimesAtRidgemontHigh.org Voted #87 - American Film Institute's Top 100 Funniest American Films _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on 2004-05-13 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |