Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox
RE: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox
From: Binder, David <dbinder_at_rwjf.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:12:19 -0400
I ONLY use MM for ripping my CDs. I tried a lot of others, including
Cdex w/LAME, and, though the quality from CDEx was good, I didn't find
it that much better than MM. The main I reason I use MM is because it is
FAST!! On average, on my Pentium III 550 PC, it takes about 1 and a half
minutes to rip a 3 minute song into a 128 mp3 file. That same song and
same bit rate using MM takes about 15 seconds!!! And, like I said, the
sound quality from MM is very, very good.
From: rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se]
On Behalf Of Nick Brodich
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:57 PM
To: Rockbox development
Subject: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox
I am wondering what peoples opinions are regarding Musicmatch Jukebox.
This program came with my Archos, so of course I installed it and
started using it. A few of its aspects have become annoying.
Additionally, I am about to replace my old computer with a newer and
better one. So the time has come for a potential change. Any thoughts
on better or more user friendly programs? Any input will be greatly
Received on 2004-05-14