|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: Opinions on Musicmatch JukeboxRE: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox
From: Binder, David <dbinder_at_rwjf.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:12:19 -0400 I ONLY use MM for ripping my CDs. I tried a lot of others, including Cdex w/LAME, and, though the quality from CDEx was good, I didn't find it that much better than MM. The main I reason I use MM is because it is FAST!! On average, on my Pentium III 550 PC, it takes about 1 and a half minutes to rip a 3 minute song into a 128 mp3 file. That same song and same bit rate using MM takes about 15 seconds!!! And, like I said, the sound quality from MM is very, very good. -David -----Original Message----- From: rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se] On Behalf Of Nick Brodich Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:57 PM To: Rockbox development Subject: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox I am wondering what peoples opinions are regarding Musicmatch Jukebox. This program came with my Archos, so of course I installed it and started using it. A few of its aspects have become annoying. Additionally, I am about to replace my old computer with a newer and better one. So the time has come for a potential change. Any thoughts on better or more user friendly programs? Any input will be greatly appreciated. Nick Brodich _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox Received on 2004-05-14 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |