Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox
Re: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox
From: Rocker <rocker_at_shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:32:22 -0600
I have never had a problem with Audio Grabber either. It has ID3 tagging,
Freak lookup and can encode to different bit rates. Not as fast as MM
though. A 20 song CD takes about 6 minutes to rip from a disk directly to
128 MP3. For those blind dudes using windows (are there blind guys using
Linox?) it uses a standard Windows interface.
PS: How do you spell Linox? Well it's Miller time again! Cheers...rocker
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Maxwell" <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org>
To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Opinions on Musicmatch Jukebox
Nick Brodich wrote:
> I am wondering what peoples opinions are regarding Musicmatch Jukebox.
I used to use it. Good as a player. Lousy for ripping.
>Any thoughts on better or more user friendly programs?
Under Windows, the only reasonable choice for ripping is Exact Audio
Copy. It has robust error detection and correction, automatic CD lookup
(via freedb), file naming, track tagging, etc. It works with just about
any encoder you would want. For MP3s, use LAME. It's generally
accepted as the best.
Received on 2004-05-14