Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Status of RLOD issueRe: Status of RLOD issue
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Daniel Gudlat <gudlat_at_web.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:03:14 +0200
Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
> Daniel Gudlat wrote:
>> Now, before I start a lengthy series of tests comparing an unmodified
>> daily build and a build using the assembler-optimized ATA routines,
>> does anyone know what I should expect from the daily builds wrt. RLOD?
>
> You could expect a lot less RLOD since my ATA fix on March 19. Some
> people claim to have experienced a lot less RLOD since that fix.
Tests yesterday showed indeed a much lower frequency of RLOD during my
usual testing setup (120 kph on the autobahn with the JBR rested on a
hard surface in the car). But they still happen with irritating
frequency both with and without the ATA assembler routines.
Damn.
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:03:14 +0200
Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
> Daniel Gudlat wrote:
>> Now, before I start a lengthy series of tests comparing an unmodified
>> daily build and a build using the assembler-optimized ATA routines,
>> does anyone know what I should expect from the daily builds wrt. RLOD?
>
> You could expect a lot less RLOD since my ATA fix on March 19. Some
> people claim to have experienced a lot less RLOD since that fix.
Tests yesterday showed indeed a much lower frequency of RLOD during my
usual testing setup (120 kph on the autobahn with the JBR rested on a
hard surface in the car). But they still happen with irritating
frequency both with and without the ATA assembler routines.
Damn.
-- Daniel Gudlat _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on 2004-06-03
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy