Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: A higher quality voicefont?
Re: A higher quality voicefont?
From: Glenn Ervin at Home <GlennErvin_at_cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:54:09 -0500
I think your solution is in the mic for the Archos.
I have used a cheap little amplified mic, about the size of a small match
box, it even fits into my Archos pouch with my recorder.
It uses a little battery or two, like a hearing aid battery, I have not yet
opened the battery compartment to know how many. But sounds are quite clear
with no hiss when I use this mic.
I think I may have paid around 15 Dollars for it from a place that usually
charges a little more than other places, but I don't have to go searching
for stuff when this place advertises that they have an item.
I posted the name of the mic in an earlier post when you first brought up
the mic issue.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christi Alice Scarborough" <christi_at_chiark.greenend.org.uk>
To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: A higher quality voicefont?
Chris Holt wrote:
> Audacity has a very good noise reduction filter, is easier to use than
> Goldwave and is free.
> Also, if you already use Nero burning software, Nero's Wave editor is very
> good. It can do the noise removal without the additional sampling process
> which makes things zip right along.
I've already tried Audacity's filter. The results were not good.
I might give Nero a try, but I doubt it will be able to produce a better
result than Audacity.
Received on 2004-06-12