Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Legal Notice Served
Re: Legal Notice Served
From: Joseph Jones <joe_at_bumpycarrot.cjb.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:04:18 +0100
Ahh, I didn't know plug-ins were considered derivative.
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Joseph Jones wrote:
>> Err, you could just have a GPL'd version, and a none GPL'd version...
>> They'd be the same source and binary, except that one didn't have the
>> GPL attached to it...
> Not really. Every plugin that is made for Rockbox is considered a
> derivate work and as such it must be distributed with a
> GPL-compatible license. It doesn't necessarily have to be GPL, but the
> license may not "impose further restrictions" than GPL.
> So, if you distribute a Rockbox version or a rockbox plugin, you must
> provide source code upon request.
>  = http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlugins
Received on 2004-06-14