dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Volunteering for porting Rockbox

Re: Volunteering for porting Rockbox

From: Ronald Teune <>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 01:10:54 +0200

But would there be big differences between 'emulating' or 'simulating' the
hardware as done now, and running natively?
Rockbox needs buttons for input; the buttons are being mapped directly
 from the keyboard. Rockbox needs ata drivers, dunno how these are handled
now, but I assume using OS standard apis, and I don't think it will be
much different when running natively. And the lcd, you could perhaps
control the graphics card on hardware level, but will that be convenient?
Maybe I'm still too simple, and haven't really looked into the ui
simulator code too. First get some sleep...


On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:58:52 +0100, Joseph Jones <>

> Ronald Teune wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Um... there has been this discussion about porting rockbox to
>> linux/windows.
>> hasn't rockbox already been ported? If I do this uisw32 thing, I can
>> see a nice rockbox popping up, doing all stuff but the mp3 playback
>> (haven't tested id3 reading though)
>> or maybe this is just my simple point of view...
>> Ronald
>> _______________________________________________
> No, that's emulating the hardware. It's not running natively.
> Joe
> _______________________________________________

Ronald Teune
= 1/2 *
Received on 2004-08-28

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy