Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Writing plug-ins
Re: Writing plug-ins
From: Mat Holton <mathew.holton_at_surface-inspection.com>
I just think it's s _real_ shame BC's code isn't part of Rockbox, as it's great code...
-----Original Message-----From: Neon John <email@example.com>To: Rockbox development <firstname.lastname@example.org>Sent: 13/01/2005 03:21Subject: Re: Writing plug-insIt's really distressing to see these two fine programmers continuing to
engage in this absolutely pointless pissing contest. IMHO, you're both
wrong. Bjorn, a name on the net means nothing. How many people on this
list do you know well enough to know that they're using their real names?
Bluechip, I certainly agree with you about not wanting your real name on
the net. If I had it to do over again 20 years past, my name would have
never made it to the net.
Whichever man gives a little will come out on top of this pissing contest,
for whatever that's worth. BC, why don't you just pull a name out of the
phone book and give him? You've made your point. Give him his precious
name and retain your anonymity.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:40:28 -0500, Brian Wolven
>Björn Stenberg wrote:
>> BlueChip wrote:
>>>It is now decreed that anybody who even looks at code written by
>>>me is "tainted" and therefore NOT allowed to submit code to Rockbox
>> Wrong again. We simply do not accept anonymous contributions. That's all.
>Looking into my crystal ball, I see Blue Chip going to the authorities
>and having his name legally changed to "Anonymous".
--- John De Armond johngdDONTYOUDARE@bellsouth.net http://bellsouthpwp.net/j/o/johngd/ Cleveland, Occupied TN _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so!" -- Douglas Adams Surface Inspection Ltd www.surface-inspection.com _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on Thu Jan 13 10:57:38 2005
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew