Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: First experience of iRiver H-140
Re: First experience of iRiver H-140
Well, since USB 2.0 is (theoretical maximum) 24 times as fast as 1.1, the
cables need to be better at some things (perhaps shielding or so). Just
like you need qualified cables if you want Gbit networking.
Neon John says he thinks most USB 1.1 cables are already good enough
though. I myself have no experience with different cables.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:14:13 -0600, Glenn at home
> I did not know that there is a different cable for USB 2.0 from 1.1.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ronald Teune" <email@example.com>
> To: "Rockbox development" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 5:36 AM
> Subject: Re: First experience of iRiver H-140
> quote from:
> USB 1.1 compliant
> Speed transfer rates up to 12 Mbps depending on USB version
> Maximum conductivity and error-free data transmission
> So, you're right, probably no USB 2.0 speeds possible. Too bad, because
> this long cable is just... well... long.
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:53:25 +0100, Johan Vromans <email@example.com>
>> Ed MacDaniel <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> Howdy BC,
>>> Will those retractable USB cables work OK for you?
>> Retractable USB cables are usually very thin. I doubt they meet the
>> USB 1.1 or 2.0 specs. AFAIK they are typically used for slow devices
>> like mice.
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong -- I'd be interested as well ;-).
>> -- Johan
Received on Wed Jan 19 01:29:08 2005
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew