Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: AW: AW: Update to the AJRv1 recharging
Re: AW: AW: Update to the AJRv1 recharging
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren_at_smiths-aerospace.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:35:15 -0500
Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Hi again,
> # -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> # Ronald Teune generated a CSV yesterday of a charge cycle with a ~9v
> # charger supply so getting a charge sample from your set up is less
> # important now. I need to compare his results with mine (stock charger &
> # battery), but it looks good so far...
> I'll do if necessary (of course) but IMHO it's not really important which
> charger you're using.
> The only thing important is that is charges with ~9V only and the algo has
> to survive a long time w/o batteries running out of juice.
While I agree in general, I wanted to make sure the charge algorithm was
stable with the 9v input. I also was curious what the on/off percentage
was for top-off and trickle compared to a "stock" charger.
It looks like I have enough information to make the call.
Thanks for helping,
Received on 2005-02-24