Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: tomas: docs PLUGIN_API,1.1,1.2Re: tomas: docs PLUGIN_API,1.1,1.2
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:05:48 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Tomas wrote:
>> What does it mean to be doxygen compatible? What is required?
> There have to be comments explaining the functions in a doxygen compatible
> format (there are lots of them). Then doxygen can read the file and make a
> nice formatted page about it, containing the names, parameters and those
> descriptions.
What about showing the crowd an example? Modify a source accordingly, run
doxygen and put the result on a URL for us to browse!
My personal experience with docs generated by doxygen is that the docs usually
is very messy and unhelpful. I wish you prove me wrong.
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:05:48 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Tomas wrote:
>> What does it mean to be doxygen compatible? What is required?
> There have to be comments explaining the functions in a doxygen compatible
> format (there are lots of them). Then doxygen can read the file and make a
> nice formatted page about it, containing the names, parameters and those
> descriptions.
What about showing the crowd an example? Modify a source accordingly, run
doxygen and put the result on a URL for us to browse!
My personal experience with docs generated by doxygen is that the docs usually
is very messy and unhelpful. I wish you prove me wrong.
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/ _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on 2005-06-02
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy