Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: raising the bar in language support
Re: raising the bar in language support
From: BlueChip <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:45:21 +0100
LOL ...now that's just abusive!
Wish I'd thought of it :)
>why not apply a mechanism that takes advantage of the gcc-preprocessor ?
>I didn't have a look at it, but I am pretty sure the gcc is able to
>ONLY do the preprocessing stuff.
>With that, strings could be #ifdef-ed like code, depending on features
>and hardware limitations instead of model names.
>#defines could be used to define the resume-key earlier and have it
>replaced to the very string later on, not having to specify a second
>and a third string that are 80% equal to each other.
>On 6/29/05, Ronald Teune <rtwolf_at_gmx.net> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel and others,
> > In the draft I see no way to make a special translation for more than one
> > model at once.
> > Example:
> > <source>
> > *: "press PLAY to resume"
> > h100,h300: "press SELECT to resume"
> > ondiosp, ondiofm: "press anything you like to resume"
> > recorderfm: "press fm button to resume"
> > </source>
> > Not sure if nobody has thought of this yet, or if it is just too much
> > hassle to implement where some copypasting can do the job, too.
> > My €0,02
> > Ronald
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:50:12 +0200, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Now, can we please put focus back on the actual contents of the file and
> > > how we should use them in the future?
> > >
> > > My updated draft (still work in progress) is now found here:
> > >
> > > http://daniel.haxx.se/rockbox/langv2
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on 2005-06-29