Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Any objections against a feature-freeze for the 2.5 release?Re: Any objections against a feature-freeze for the 2.5 release?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 22:51:15 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Michiel van der Kolk wrote:
> I'd like to implement at least song rating and playcount properly before a
> feature freeze, or wouldn't these be considered extra features?
While that is a cool set of features that will improve Rockbox nicely, I am
against adding those things in the 2.5 release since they are still very early
at this point and it feels (to me) like they'll require a fair amount of time
and testing to mature and become good.
What do others think?
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 22:51:15 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Michiel van der Kolk wrote:
> I'd like to implement at least song rating and playcount properly before a
> feature freeze, or wouldn't these be considered extra features?
While that is a cool set of features that will improve Rockbox nicely, I am
against adding those things in the 2.5 release since they are still very early
at this point and it feels (to me) like they'll require a fair amount of time
and testing to mature and become good.
What do others think?
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/ _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on 2005-07-04
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy