From: Michiel van der Kolk <michiel_at_snt.utwente.nl>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 11:58:22 +0200

On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:08:47PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Michiel van der Kolk wrote:
>
> >incidentally, the code *is* distributed inside the .jar, so everyone
> >should have access to the sourcecode... just unpack the .jar with winzip
> >or the like..
>
> It is, yes, but if it truly is GPL I believe you violate it (due to the
> lack of license text, copyright texts/headers etc). And since only you
> build and distribute it, no other Rockbox developer can fix bugs or add
> features directly like we can with the other tagdb tools.
>
> All this together means this songdb.jar (is that the name of the tool?) is
> a non-Rockbox provided tool. Nothing wrong with that.
>
I'll completely dig out the licensing info today, but as far as i've
seen the projects that were distributing their source didn't have a
COPYING file either. anywho.
I don't really care about whether its put in cvs or not.. so... lets do
a poll about who's against it being in cvs? benefits of it being in cvs
should be clear.. source access for everyone + build tool..

> --
> Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/
> _______________________________________________
> http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

HCl
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on 2005-07-09