dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: raising the bar in language support

Re: raising the bar in language support

From: BlueChip <>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:11:58 +0100

>Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> > I can see where having an xml parser might be usefull. But I don't think
> > we need to code one:
> >
> > have a look at :
>I'm not so sure using a parser such as this is a great idea. I may be
>the only one who cares, but it's written in C++ so not only would we be
>adding someone else's C++ code into Rockbox we'd have to write C++
>wrapper functions so our existing C code could make use of it. More C++
>code. I, for one, like the fact that Rockbox is entirely written in C
>(well, minus the assembly).

I agree C++ is not inside Rockbox coding standards, and I also happen to
personally disklike it.

The code isn't that big, it could be "unwrapped" without too much effort.


Received on 2005-07-11

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy