Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: == NEW DEVKIT v3.11 AVAILABLE ==
Re: == NEW DEVKIT v3.11 AVAILABLE ==
From: BlueChip <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:35:20 +0100
Yes, this is another good and simple solution to the problem.
As the core devs have been unable to fix this, perhaps someone more
experienced in such matters could submit a patch for this?
>Would it make sense to run 'tools make' from the configure script?
>Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 22:49 +0200, Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
> >> BlueChip wrote:
> >> > Before I document a work-around to this problem ...Would any of the
> >> core
> >> > guys care to comment on any reasons why this cannot be included as a
>part of the build process?
> >> The makefils actually did this not long ago, but we removed it. The
>reason is that make wasn't very good at handling cross compilation and
>native compilation in the same build, resulting in weird errors on some
> > Uh, isn't that the idea behind using $HOSTCC and $CC?
> > ie, CC for the target, HOSTCC for things that need to be compiled for
> > For the simulator, CC would be equal to HOSTCC, but for the iriver and
>archos builds, you'd set CC to m68k-elf-gcc/sh-elf-gcc and leave HOSTCC
>as just gcc...
> > It's the convention I've run into in the past, at least.
> > Andrew
>Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be
>changed regularly, and for the same reason.
Received on 2005-07-21