Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: 20050729 audio buffering
Re: 20050729 audio buffering
From: Pedro Vasconcelos <pbv_at_st-andrews.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:54:13 +0100
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:29:09 +0200
Magnus Holmgren <lear_at_algonet.se> wrote:
> You can also note that the pcm buffer is much smaller (especially with
> no crossfade), and the so called watermark limit has not been reduced
Ah, I hadn't noticed that. Any clue as to why was the buffer made smaller?
> I have a build with somewhat lower watermark, and also a bit larger
> buffer. With that, I get a boost ratio of about 31-32% on a file around
> 180 kbps (-q6, with replaygain on). Perhaps I should commit those
> changes soon (I do want to test a bit more though).
Good, that would be on level with the boost ratio sans vorbisgain.
Received on 2005-07-29