Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: 20050729 audio buffering
Re: 20050729 audio buffering
From: Magnus Holmgren <lear_at_algonet.se>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:09:17 +0200
Pedro Vasconcelos wrote:
>>You can also note that the pcm buffer is much smaller (especially with
>>no crossfade), and the so called watermark limit has not been reduced
> Ah, I hadn't noticed that. Any clue as to why was the buffer made smaller?
To leave more room for the file buffering mainly. But the purpose of
that was to increase battery time, not reduce it...
Received on 2005-07-29