|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Recording V2.4 vs. CVS 050828 (strange Xing VBR header - possible value overflow?)Recording V2.4 vs. CVS 050828 (strange Xing VBR header - possible value overflow?)
From: Martin Borus <mborus_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:10:35 +0200 Hi I've had some problems with long time recordings lately. Problems were caused by the VBR header - the recordings played, but navigation in them was not working properly. To check this out I made two nearly identical recordings. One using firmware 2.4, one using CVS 050828. Both are aprox 1.5 GB in size. Recording settings were quality 5, 44.1 kHz, stereo, independent frames. See comparison screenshot "http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/8250/rockbox5lm.gif" The 2.4 recording has no Xing header and works OK in Winamp, mp3directcut and other programs. The CVS 050828 recording has a VBR header, but the reported values are very strange. Average frame size and Average bit rate values are useless. This causes rewinding of the file to fail and ruins the navigation within the file. Is it possible that the calculation of these values fails in Rockbox for extremely large files? If this can't be fixed, it might be useful to make the VBR header optional in 2.5 Regards Martin _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox Received on 2005-08-29 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |