Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: hcl: tools songdb.pl,1.39,1.40Re: hcl: tools songdb.pl,1.39,1.40
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 19:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, cvs_at_labb.contactor.se wrote:
> slight change in the bad CRC returned, to make rundb code handle it better.
Can you please explain why 0 is a better "faked" CRC than 1? Both can be a
valid CRC so setting 0 is not a good way to detect it as disabled, right?
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 19:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, cvs_at_labb.contactor.se wrote:
> slight change in the bad CRC returned, to make rundb code handle it better.
Can you please explain why 0 is a better "faked" CRC than 1? Both can be a
valid CRC so setting 0 is not a good way to detect it as disabled, right?
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/ _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on 2005-09-03
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy