From: Glenn at home <GlennErvin_at_cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:11:47 -0500

I have found that you can get better reception by using different headphones.
I suspect that the cheaper the headphones, the better the reception.
I hypothesize that better headphones are better insolated, and therefore make a worse antenna.
Glenn

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric
To: XavierGr ; Rockbox
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: Thoughts on FM Radio Presets and functionality.


Xavier, it sounds like you play with the radio a bit.

Have you found any ways to increase the reception. It seems pretty poor.

Admittedly, it could just be where I live, where I mostly use it, and it also seems that many of the MP3 players that have FM don't do well.

Thanks!


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: XavierGr
  To: Rockbox development
  Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 7:46 AM
  Subject: Thoughts on FM Radio Presets and functionality.


  Now that FM radio is present for the iriver (with presets) I spend some time to read the manual how exactly the radio works on Archos.
  I was suprised to see that a lot can be done to achieve something better with the FM (little details).

  In my mind (I don't know why) I thought that Rockbox supports dynamic preset, saving and loading, instead of the cliche "constant" numbered presets.
  So why not make the FM radio a little more usable and smart?
  What I am thinking is to be able to save and load presets from physical files, instead of the "add only" option.
  This would be extremely usefull for those that travel a lot and 32 stations are too little, or much of a hassle to rename.

  I am waiting for advice....
Received on 2005-09-24