Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: regression in battery charging since going to 2.5?? (probably not but ..)
Re: regression in battery charging since going to 2.5?? (probably not but ..)
From: Tom Cole <tcole_at_xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:35:44 +1300
The charging is done by hardware in V2 models, so there would be no
point in reverting to an earlier version of Rockbox.
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:21:20 -0600, "Glenn at home"
>Is this a problem with the V2 models too?
>If so, I may drop back to 2.4.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dan Richardson" <spam_at_nottooloud.com>
>To: "Rockbox" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:09 AM
>Subject: Re: regression in battery charging since going to 2.5?? (probably
>not but ..)
>Jeff N wrote:
>> I also have noticed a dramatic decrease in battery life since going to 2.5
>Also, the team had finally gotten the charging to work
>with the AJBR1 and my 9 volt switching charger,
>but with 2.5 it's broken again.
>Redundancy maniac that I am, I brought
>my stock charger and a 220/110 voltage convertor
>to London along with my 9v charger.
>If I hadn't, I'd have missed recording
>an awful lot of my theater company's shows.
>When was the charging algorithm last modified?
>Is there a comprehensive changelog posted anywhere?
>I've looked before without success.
>That'd be an interesting document.
Received on 2005-11-03