|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: fdisk vs disklabel vs rockboxRe: fdisk vs disklabel vs rockbox
From: victor rajewski <askvictor_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:50:23 +1100 I've used GNU Parted quite successfully a number of times; seems to do everything at once quite happily. On 11/23/05, George Michaelson <ggm_at_apnic.net> wrote: > > so I decided having two partitions, one for UNIX and one for rockbox on > the 60gb was silly, and used the NetBSD disklabel tool to re-size my > MS-DOS FAT32 partition. > > this worked fine, as did newfs_msdos, and the subsequent copy of the > files back from the archive. Hmm.. 6Gb of headroom! yummy. > > but then I found I was getting random 'no such directory' and 'cannot > open file' when in UNIX. > > rockbox didn't care. played all this shiny new music fine. > > Turns out, I forgot to modify the sector 0 'fdisk' block to resize the > partition, and this was being honoured by the UNIX OS when they did > fopen() readdir() seek() etc on the mounted filespace! > > but rockbox just seems to follow the FAT chains. it doesn't care! so > having got the data on there once, I was able to see it when in rockbox. > > WinXP also didn't like it much, but would happily chkdsk it (or > whatever is the XP equivalent) back to its old 47Gb size. > > moral of the story: ALWAYS make sure you resize *all* records of > logical disk structure, not just the ones you *think* apply.. > > (only minor information loss from thinking I had bad HDD blocks and > wiping out some files before I realized what I'd done..) > > -G > Received on 2005-11-29 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |