Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Updated voiceBox package
Re: Updated voiceBox package
From: Brian Wolven <bcwolven_at_jhu.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:58:28 -0500
Jens Arnold wrote:
> On 29.11.2005, Brian Wolven wrote:
>> Jens Arnold wrote:
>>> On 28.11.2005, Brian Wolven wrote:
>>>> Thanks to some free time during the Thanksgiving holiday,
>>>> there is now a new version of voiceBox, available at the
>>>> usual place:
>>> Looks rather good, and works. However, it seems that
>>> 'Overwrite existing .talk files' doesn't work.
>> Hrmmmm, I just tried running it three times, toggling back and
>> forth on the 'Overwrite existing .talk files' option. In all
>> cases it worked properly. Saving a shortcut to the desktop and
>> running it from there also overwrote the old .talk files. Has
>> anyone else seen this behavior?
> When I tried, no matter what I set the option to, the script
> didn't touch already existing .talk files. I admit that I
> replaced the oldish lame version with 3.96.1. Could that be a
I tried it with 3.96.1 (Verified below) and it still worked fine for me. Could
you have gotten one of the experimental LAME builds that is set up to use an ini
file instead of command line options?
LAME version 3.96.1 (http://lame.sourceforge.net/)
usage: lame.exe [options] <infile> [outfile]
<infile> and/or <outfile> can be "-", which means stdin/stdout.
"lame.exe --help" for general usage information
"lame.exe --preset help" for information on suggested predefined settings
or "lame.exe -?" for a complete options list
Received on 2005-11-29