From: <ashridah_at_netspace.net.au>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 14:27:18 +1100

Quoting Jacob <jacob01_at_gmx.net>:
>
> Like Jochen wrote, it's rather the In-Reply-To header.

Heh. that's what I get for not checking the RFC. *hangs head in shame*.

You're right tho, References lists every mail up the chain to the root of the
thread iirc, In-Reply-To is the one to add. Are they both Must-have's? or just
In-Reply-To?
One wonders how many email clients examine References over In-Reply-To and vice
versa, however, and what having differences between the two would do >:)

Andrew


------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au
Received on 2005-12-17